2012 (1) February (1) 2011 (9) October (2) September (3) June (3) February (1) 2010

Pythagoreans shit? You may find a rational number (or fraction too) to its power duo exactly? Looks like not so mathematically show you why it is not. Why is this thing so much Pythagoreans teased? Why, a fraction - or too rational number, right - is something we can be expressed as a ratio of two numbers harvard a / b Becky therefore must not Beit zero. Pythagoreans hoped that in their geometry will be able to use only measure of length, which goes rational cislama. These are the simple values expressible in konecnejch harvard values; daj is therefore used for distance measurement that can Beit how big they want or too small so. If only the whole geometry, fractions been using it would probably everything was fine and quite simple. Yet irrational number you want us to an endless process and that of the Greeks did get a big no problem (but not surprising). What is so stupid on that there is no rational number on which the mighty Two? It actually comes out of Pythagorejskyho theorems. If we Euclidean geometry mame ctverec who's harvard ma Ones sides and diagonals is thus 1 + 1 ^ 2 ^ 2 = 2 (here you have to throw figure). But that would be stupid enough Should it find the number that could not describe harvard the diagonal of a square. Pythagoreans first tried to 'any number :)' that could be described by a fraction of Beit celejch numbers. We will show you why it is not, but now I go to sleep.
2012 (1) February (1) 2011 (9) October (2) September (3) June (3) February (1) 2010 (8) November (4) October (3) March (1) 2009 (2) October (2) Hilbert space Jaky sou number in our world?