But instead of discussing privacy might be to steer the debate on how to actually want the future t

Now it has not received any answer at all for a while, and people have well gone on holiday upsc for a long time. So then it might as well bite the bullet and look at the responses received. In total 46 people answered the questionnaire. If we are to take and present the results so it will be well per question ...
This means the highest value 5 that everything should be done and one that everything is fine as it is. The cut was 2.83, basically it works well, but there should be some fine tuning. You who answered 4 or 5 here, what should be done better?
5 means great political influence, no one at all. The incision was 3.07. I personally do not think there have been some political influence at all, but it is "old media" as hooked on sometimes and most talked ethics in the workplace. That some work has been the authorities seems to be important, but that the surveillance would have been somewhat negative, I have not heard.
Two people who answered the survey using Creepers RSS feeds. They are poorly marked? At the top of every page on the Creeper is a link to the RSS feed for that site or the Agency. It might be even clearer? upsc
The most common view here is that the Creeper shall monitor all organizations paid for by public funds, upsc right down to the municipal level. I think this is questionable for several reasons. In many businesses, it is individuals who are not working public who use computers for Internet access, such bibiotek, employment agencies and schools. This allows the results of such monitoring upsc is both ethically unattractive, but also completely irrelevant upsc to the Creeper (whose purpose is not to monitor Svennebanan).
Other groups that you think Creeper shall monitor the lobbyists, individual politicians, think tanks and the media. Several also want the Creeper has better coverage on multiple and larger sites. But the final yards, I do not quite over, it's up to the owner of the website to use the Creeper.
Responses to this was similar to the previous question, but with a little more detailed content. Monitoring of the politician's home network, automatic analysis of public documents and that monitoring should be done with image and sound. Here is the creeper upsc little left to do. :-)
1 is poor, 5 is excellent. The average value was 2.61. The funny thing is that the responses varied between extremes of 1 and 5. Maybe because "bad" means good, and 'very good' means that you are afraid that the FRA will monitor all very good. I do not know.
Two of the responses were "neither" or "do not know", the rest were homogeneous "increase". So, if everyone believes that monitoring in general will increase, why should not we adapt laws and regulations after this? To stop the general monitoring the trend seems the no faith in. In a blog post from December I write this:
But instead of discussing privacy might be to steer the debate on how to actually want the future to look like, when the monitoring will be a fact. I have heard very few discuss this. Not even the majority upsc of future books that discuss the singularity and virtual worlds are discussed much integrity.
There is every reason to continue coverage. But even start questioning. Now it is done without a real answer to why? Although in individual cases, may appear to be obvious. But the authorities are monitoring, * must * never happen without any form of criticism upsc and opposition.
Recent Comments JB on MAC addresses are personal data? pawal on two-factor authentication is easily upsc pawal on two-factor authentication is easily Frederick on two-factor authentication is easily Jonas on many alternative software for DNS
Categories Apple (1) Books (2) Censorship (1) Creeper (26) d free (1) DNS (4) DRM (3) Events (1) creeper (6) Hacks (9) Hardware (20) Humor (3) Identity (6) The IETF (2) Privacy (30) IPv6 (2) journalists (17), Linux (22) Audio (10) Microsoft (5) Minecraft (1) Software (15) MP3 (4) Music (22) OldSchool (8 ) Politics (23) Programming (6) Security (24) Gossip (5) Spam (5) Statistics (7) Waffle (10) Competition (1) Copyright (15) Videos (1) Virtualization (1) Visualization upsc (6) VoIP (1) Web 2.0 (5)
Archives February 2015 (1) January 2015 (1) September 2014 (2) June 2014 (1) May 2014 (1) April 2014 (2) September 2011 (1) July 2011 (1) April 2011 (1) March 2011 (2 ) January 2011 (1) December 2010 (2) October 2010 (1) September 2010 (1) July 2010 (1) March 2010 (1) February upsc 2010 (1) January 2010 (1) October 2009 (1) July 2009 (1 ) June 2009 (3) May 2009 (1) March 2009 (1) February 2009 (1) January 2009 (3) December 2008 (2) November 2008 (3) October 2008 (3) September 2008 (3) August 2008 (1 ) July 2008 (5) June 2008 (3) May 20