Common people or not - they still work on, for example, the FBI nor the FRA and surfing during work

The monitoring is done by you on your own web pages link an image. This image allows the creeper can take the information that a download of the image gives that to look at what IP address the request comes from and the reference that allows the download of the image occurs.
I have driven stanford university it to the test a little while, and it has provided some fun results. Too bad FRA hide their referrer. If you want to go ahead and participate in monitoring stanford university baby brother, you can also add the image to your blog.
RS says:
A small "Feature Request" however. When I had peeked at some of the links on the results page, so it hit me, that I was curious about was not primarily the authority visited any side, but the exact opposite, which pages agencies visited, what specific authority felt secondary - Perhaps they visited any site that I wrote comments on? This look is now just by wading through links with the official name. Please add the name of sjten they visited visibly directly, for example. in parentheses, or have authority names in parentheses.
On Let's see now .. if now the supervisor does not like this, and in different ways want to deny us this little insight into a very small part of what the supervisor does, then it is we who can justifiably ask what authority has to hide . This is particularly important because it is precisely the authorities we are talking about, for who is it that has the power to hurt us worst, "Tom, Dick o pleti 'or our own bodies? Yeah that's stanford university right .. It's blah. why journalists _skall_ reviewing power, that is why those in power is automatically seen as public figures must tolerate the examination light, and moreover it is why we advocate the basic human rights stanford university freedoms and rights around the world, because we want to protect people from the regime they live under, not protect stanford university regimes from people.
Armok: Yes, I have started from the list. But I thought it was a bit uninteresting to monitor Land Survey and such things. Moreover, it was a bit laborious to look up the IP addresses that belonged to whom.
Pingback: Novus :: Creeper - New monitoring service :: :: May 2007
I'm not technically versed enough to understand what a "referrer" is for something, but I wonder if it really Gat to distinguish between an authority that monitors and an employee who surf in the private interest?
Hahahaha, how paranoid can you be really?
While it's an exciting idea with "big brother" that monitors one's blog so ... Think now: Do not you think people on the FBI nor the FRA are ordinary people who sometimes slösurfar little at work outside his official role? Or revenue, with more than 10,000 employees. That someone stanford university reading a blog sometimes can hardly be interpreted as monitoring other than for those who have seen little to much on film? / AG
May 9, 2007 at 00:29
Common people or not - they still work on, for example, the FBI nor the FRA and surfing during working hours. All people are "ordinary people" at times, but that does not make it less interesting. I surf a lot of what could be designated as private stanford university during working hours, but picks up all the time threads that can be useful in the work ...
How about allowing people to register themselves and their site and thus get a unique ID number to add url; an image? If so, you can still determine whether the referrer blocking or not. It might not be as easy as now, but would not it be nice to be able to contrast a bit? Another improvement would be to create an "empty" image on a transparent pixel that people would link to that does not show directly that the site is monitored.
Btw pawal get government organizations use proxy chains, or the like? Could well be remarkable in that case. Ought to be guidelines for that? Do not know if there is any legal text proving that it would be illegal for them to use contacts / services to hide some traffic?
I think you're missing my point. To monitor the state and ensure that it does what we pay for it is one thing; to monitor private organizations quite another. It is important to distinguish between the office and the person or organization that currently holds the chair. Or is it OK to monitor Reinfeldt private traffic just because he happens to be prime minister?
Ethics, thanks (?) To it is so dynamic. Depends on how you look at it. Indirectly, he has the responsibility over to our traffic flows through the strange filters. Why feel remorse? But I think I understand where you are going. Sure, there is always one individual (or several individuals) behind an office or organization. But it could prove lengthy, in that organizations have interests to protect, and in short we can say that it is not possible to compare an individual with an organization (Co.), iochmed an organization usually has very low ethics and morality if there is a demand for the